言語

Content Completeness Audit

Free, no signup. See which useful content formats are already substantive, which are thin, which the page genuinely warrants—and which would only pad it.

Built by Patrick Stox

Audit one page

Do not submit confidential drafts, signed/private URLs, passwords, API keys, access tokens, personal data, or other secrets. A public URL may include a query for fetching, but its credentials, query, and fragment are removed from displayed, shared, and exported source metadata.

Your input is sent to the AI model to generate a result — it is not stored afterward. Editorial AI is strictly opt-in. With it off, paste analysis stays in this browser; URL mode still sends the entered public URL to the bounded page fetcher. Results are not stored by the audit endpoint. Anonymous run-level outcome counters may be used for aggregate research; URLs, domains, IPs, and identifiers are never included, and no statistic is released below 100 runs.

Feedback
Report a bug

Found something broken in Content Completeness Audit? Let us know what happened — this goes straight to a private triage queue, not a public list.

What will be sent 
 No tool inputs, uploads, pasted source, complete results, query parameters, or URL fragments are attached automatically. You can edit or remove the selected passage above. Browser and anti-abuse metadata is processed for spam prevention. 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 
Sample report
 
Deterministic example — editorial AI remains off
 
Present and substantive: step-by-step instructions, anti-patterns, validation tests, and measurement guidance.
Not evaluated: absent formats whose editorial value cannot be established by structure alone.
 
 
 
How to use it
 
  1. Enter one public URL or paste one page’s text or HTML.
  2. Leave editorial AI unchecked for a local deterministic presence audit, or explicitly opt in for missing-element gating.
  3. Review grounded hooks for every thin or suggested element and the anti-padding list for formats that should stay absent.
  4. Export the ledger, tickets, or brief stubs, make reviewed edits, then rerun the same page.
 
 
     
 Local data 
Saved targets, named lists, and recent check summaries remain only in this browser.
 
   
 
      
 
How it works
 
The 14-element taxonomy and decision rules are derived from the editorial rubric used to review 473 of my own articles. Deterministic structural detectors always run first. When explicitly enabled, one bounded editorial pass decides whether absent formats are justified. Every add or thin hook must be an exact substring of extracted page text or code rejects it.
 
Limits
 
The tool evaluates one supplied page and makes no competitor, ranking, factual-accuracy, originality, traffic, or search-demand claim. URL fetches are bounded to 2 MiB and do not render JavaScript. Editorial AI receives at most the first 40,000 extracted characters and may return not-evaluated states. A suggested format still requires human research and editorial judgment.
 
Frequently asked questions
 
Is this a topic-gap or ranking score?
No. It checks whether 14 editorial formats are substantive, thin, absent but justified, or correctly absent. It does not compare competitors, predict rankings, or reward adding more sections.
Does the audit require AI?
No. The default audit runs deterministic presence checks in your browser. Editorial AI is off until you select the opt-in checkbox; missing-element decisions remain not evaluated without it.
What is sent when I opt into editorial AI?
For pasted or unpublished content, the supplied content is sent to the Product Worker and up to 40,000 extracted characters are sent to Cloudflare Workers AI. URL mode fetches the public URL server-side. Do not use confidential drafts, signed or private URLs, secrets, or credentials.
Does URL mode render JavaScript?
No. It fetches a bounded public HTML response. Paste rendered HTML when important content exists only after client-side JavaScript runs.
Why are some verdicts not evaluated?
Truncated input, an unavailable or disabled AI service, exhausted budgets, invalid model output, or choosing the deterministic-only mode can all preserve honest not-evaluated states instead of inventing recommendations.
 
 
People also explore
ToolCitation Gap CheckerToolAI Content AuditToolCommodity Content / Information Gain CheckerArticleSEO Audit ChecklistArticleContent Freshness
 
 
 
Feature requests for Content Completeness Audit
 

Upvote what you want most. New ideas can be submitted from the floating Feedback menu;
      requests appear here once approved, and the most-wanted rise to the top.

   
Loading…
  
  ➕ Request a feature   
New requests are reviewed before they appear here.
 
     
  
  
 
 
 
 
     
     
ツールについて
14種類の有用なコンテンツ形式について、存在を決定論的に確認します。
編集上のAIゲートは明示的に有効化した場合だけ任意で実行し、ルールの結果と未確認の状態を分けます。
機能
  • 14形式の存在チェック
  • 決定論的な欠落・重複の検出
  • 任意で明示的に有効化できる編集AIゲート
  • 形式ごとの結果と次のアクション
仕組み
ページを見出し、概要、FAQ、手順、例、データ、引用などの形式へ分解し、各形式の有無を決定論的に記録します。明示的に有効化された場合だけ編集ゲートの結果を別枠で表示します。
制限事項
  • 存在チェックは形式や手掛かりの有無を確認するだけで、内容の正確性、品質、成果、AI引用を保証しません。
  • AIゲートを有効にしても編集判断を自動承認せず、出力は人のレビューが必要です。
よくある質問
すべての形式があれば良いコンテンツですか？
いいえ。形式の存在は網羅性の手掛かりにすぎません。正確性、意図、読者、専門性を別途確認してください。
AIゲートは自動で公開しますか？
いいえ。明示的に有効化した場合の補助結果です。編集、承認、公開は人が判断してください。
14形式すべてが必要ですか？
いいえ。ページの目的と読者に必要な形式だけを選び、不要な追加を避けてください。